The U.S. Election: A Battle for "Ballot Slaves"

1. The Essence of Southern State Voting Blocs: The Evolution from Plantation Slaves to “Ballot Slaves”

The spirit of the U.S. Constitution draws from the Roman slave code, while its election system is influenced by the College of Cardinals in the Catholic Church. The U.S. slaveholders claimed to embody the ideals of the French Revolution—equality, liberty, democracy, and fraternity. However, they never truly believed in these values. Enlightenment thought from Europe was, to them, little more than the emperor's new clothes.

The highest governing organization in the American power structure is essentially a network of secret alliances among major corporations. Their laws are rooted in the Roman slave code, and their electoral processes mimic the Catholic canon law, creating an ironic contrast to the so-called spirit of the French Revolution and Enlightenment ideals.

Historically, British legal professionals upheld order and opposed reform, while in France, where legal professionals were excluded from political influence, they spearheaded revolutionary movements. In 1789, it was lawyers who led the people to overthrow the monarchy. In the United States, where a hereditary aristocracy never existed, lawyers and judges filled the void, establishing themselves as the American aristocratic class.

As a result, throughout American history, approximately 60% of U.S. presidents have come from the legal profession—a proportion strikingly high compared to other countries. In the U.S., these lawyers primarily serve the interests of a small group of elite slaveholders.

This small group of slaveholders, along with their lawyer allies, took five years to draft the U.S. Constitution at the nation’s founding. Between the slaveholding and enslaved classes, a strict two-way class division was enforced. Among the slaveholders themselves, intense competition for profit and power prevailed, with disputes often boiling down to the smallest of differences.

Within this ruling class, power balances were essential to securing additional interests, which elevated the role of lawyers in American society. These legal professionals, to protect the interests of the elite, structured the American electoral system in such a way that it completely excludes the enslaved class from participating.

Contrary to popular belief, U.S. democratic elections do not involve every citizen voting directly for the president. Instead, the president is chosen by the Electoral College. Members of the Electoral College are appointed by political parties and are staunch party loyalists. Essentially, they are party operatives tasked with safeguarding party interests.

U.S. presidential candidates are first selected by large corporate groups. The first criterion is lineage; candidates are expected to come from WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant) backgrounds. The U.S. is ruled jointly by WASP financial groups and the Jewish “Our Crowd” financial network. Second, candidates’ values must align closely with those of these powerful financial groups. In reality, the U.S. president wields very little actual power. Major financial interests not only groom presidential candidates but also invest heavily in Congress to create checks and balances, ensuring that the president does not overreach in executive authority.

Legislation and national policy-making in the U.S. take place outside of government channels. Think tanks and foundations aligned with elite interests begin by initiating academic research to generate ideas and recommendations. Then, policy-making institutions, directly controlled by these elites, craft actionable policies. Once formulated, these policies go to Congress for broader discussion. Media machinery is then mobilized to shape public opinion, creating an illusion of popular support. When everything is set, the president formally signs the policy.

If the president does not comply, impeachment can be initiated, using judicial power to remove and replace them. In truth, within the real power structure, the president is little more than a host in the “broadcast hall” of the White House, presenting and performing the policies crafted by the elite.

Each state generates a certain number of electors based on its population, who vote in a winner-takes-all system. In most states, if a candidate secures even a single more vote than their opponent, that state is considered won by that candidate's party.

In Southern states, though African American and Latino populations belong to the “slave class” without substantial power, their numbers allow them to influence election outcomes in various states. Both parties therefore work hard to court and appeal to these communities. Their role, as “ballot slaves,” is to lend support to the competing elite groups behind the two major parties.

Within the American power structure, the electoral system is deliberately separated from the masses to avoid direct popular influence, which they refer to as “tyranny of the majority.” From the Constitution to elections, the system has never truly embodied public will.

Through racial, educational, class, and political segregation, America's elite have brought the Roman slave system to new heights. Meanwhile, the “enslaved” remain trapped in a carefully constructed ideological and media prison from which there is little chance of release.

In ancient Rome, slaves did not celebrate their masters’ electoral outcomes. Yet in modern America, ballot slaves are often moved to tears, either in joy or anger, over the results of an election manipulated by the elite.

Digging Their Own Grave: The Politics of Slaveholding in the U.S.

The more population a state has, the more electoral votes it can secure, thus increasing its influence in the presidential election. So, where does this population come from? The elite class cannot realistically produce such large population growth on its own. Declining birth rates among white Americans further limit their numbers. This leaves African Americans and Latinos, with their relatively high birth rates, as key players in securing votes. Combined, African Americans and Latinos now total over 100 million people in the U.S., not counting the millions of undocumented immigrants.

Why does the Democratic Party push for green cards for undocumented immigrants? These individuals represent ideal “voter labor,” increasing electoral votes and potentially winning more states. Winning the election allows them to control all the benefits. The social impacts of adding millions of undocumented immigrants? Few within the elite care about these consequences.

Trump's push to expel undocumented immigrants and build a wall along the Mexican border stems from his understanding of the looming demographic shift. Currently, the white population retains an advantage only among those aged 44 and older, meaning that younger generations of people of color are becoming the majority. When the current older white population passes on, whites could fall to 40% or less of the population.

What does this mean? It means America as it has been traditionally understood could lose its foundation. Spanish could become an official language, and an African American or Mexican American could become president. The Constitution could be amended to dismantle the interests of the elite white class, and white Americans could face discrimination or even persecution. This scenario would resemble post-revolution South Africa, where black leaders overturned white dominance, sparking widespread discrimination and violence against the white population.

In this context, Trump can be seen as a champion for white Americans’ future. By contrast, the elites backing Biden are short-sighted, prioritizing immediate gains while jeopardizing the nation's long-term stability. Following the South African revolution, many white South Africans fled; those who remained often faced difficult lives filled with discrimination, oppression, and violence.

As America's demographics shift, the country seems to be heading down a similar path. Currently, white Americans represent just over 60% of the population; in a decade, this could drop below 50%. Within two decades, it could fall to 40%.

The Democratic Party's policies of leniency and favoritism toward African Americans and Latinos serve 

its interests in the short term but are ultimately self-destructive. This approach recalls the USSR's "two lenient, one tolerant" policy, which contributed to its eventual collapse.

Trump recognized this dire trajectory, motivating him to intervene and defend the future of white Americans, while attempting to preserve the American identity. However, the divisions within the U.S. are now deeply entrenched—be they racial, ideological, or among interest groups. Even if Trump and the extreme right-wing elite backing him were to win the election and impose strict policies, including repressive measures against African Americans and Latinos, the U.S. could face a civil war, echoing the tensions of the Civil War era.

Opposition to Trump has become a consensus among most Americans. His presence challenges the rules of the political game. Like any structure, if the internal framework is suddenly altered, collapse can follow. America, too, may face disintegration if Trump's “renovations” to the existing power structure prove incompatible with its foundational dynamics.

This is why figures like George Soros and others fear Trump: the elites were only interested in swapping out America’s outer “facade,” whereas Trump aims to overhaul its structural pillars. Anyone familiar with construction knows that removing load-bearing walls is dangerous. And what Trump proposes might be even riskier.

Slave Rebellion: An Eruption Waiting to Happen

Why do American police seem so inclined to shoot Black individuals, and why do Black Americans sometimes respond by killing police? This dynamic is rooted in history. It’s like asking why cats hunt mice or why people instinctively fear snakes—some memories are embedded in culture, and some, perhaps, even in our genes.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was the first to mandate that Northern law enforcement assist in capturing escaped slaves, imposing heavy penalties on those who refused. This historical precedent has created an almost instinctual reaction, akin to a cat chasing a mouse, where American law enforcement may instinctively react with hostility toward Black individuals.

The deepening socioeconomic divide in America, exacerbated by the exploitation of the elite, has intensified social tensions to an unprecedented degree—now, it feels like a mere spark could set everything ablaze.

Trump's rise revealed the potential power of public opinion beyond U.S. borders. Until recently, America’s election system kept the “slave class” at arm's length, reflecting only the interests of the elite, not the will of the people. The perspectives of Black Americans, Latinos, and disenfranchised “redneck” whites are all part of this public sentiment. The system that meticulously controls the “slave class” now faces a potential rupture.

Breaking down the politically correct ideologies controlled by elites, dismantling left-wing ideological constraints, and freeing Americans from their “intellectual prisons” represents a liberation of the “vote slaves” from elite control. This would finally grant real political power to the people and enable the Constitution to genuinely reflect public interest—akin to a new abolition movement.

On the issue of “vote slavery,” it is now the Democratic Party playing the role of the slaveholders, while the “abolitionists” are represented by the revisionist Republicans. Trump is not a traditional Republican; establishment Republicans wouldn't betray the elite class, and the tensions between the elite factions represented by the Democrats and Republicans have, so far, remained an internal power struggle, not yet reaching a breaking point.

However, Trump's arrival accelerated the divide. His warning that America faces the risk of division and civil war is not mere alarmism. If the Democratic Party continues with policies of appeasement and favoritism, especially regarding “vote slaves,” soon enough, whites will become a minority, undermining the foundational character of America.

For Black and Latino communities, the Democratic Party's policies have fostered resentment under the guise of empowerment, creating an atmosphere of reverse racism that everyone senses but few openly acknowledge. As divisions between different racial groups deepen, so too do underlying tensions. For now, these communities are placated by Democratic resources, but when America's economy deteriorates further and the Democrats can no longer sustain this, the “volcano” may finally erupt.

If this happens, it would resemble the Spartacus rebellion in ancient Rome, engulfing America in flames. With firearms accessible to almost everyone, a nationwide uprising would look like the apocalyptic scenarios of Hollywood films.

At its core, America is a slave society, cloaked in a facade of civilization. Although the system of control has become more sophisticated, its essence remains tied to the slave-driven structure. Officially, slavery was abolished, but it has never truly left America, as it's embedded in its very soul.

American elites may speak of democracy and display symbols like the Statue of Liberty, which supposedly embodies the spirit of the French Revolution. But the ruling class, the “slave masters” and “cardinals” of the power structure, have never believed in true equality or democracy. To them, people are secondary to profit. Their goal is not only to maintain a slave system domestically but also to expand it globally.

America has followed ancient Rome's trajectory in many ways, and its decline may also mirror Rome's downfall. Declining birth rates among the ruling population, increasing social stratification, economic stagnation, political instability, and rising internal divisions all echo Rome's last days. The powerful are unable to resolve these conflicts, and when the oppressed rise—like the gladiators of Rome—the end may follow. History has a way of repeating itself.